MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400356338 · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03532-5

Climate data for building simulations with urban heat island effects and nature-based solutions

2024· article· en· W4400356338 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Henry Lu, Abhishek Gaur, Michael Lacasse

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsUrban heat islandEnvironmental scienceEcologyComputer scienceGeographyMeteorologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As cities face a changing climate, buildings will be subjected to increasing energy demand, heat stress, thermal comfort issues, and decreased service life. Therefore, evaluating building performance under climate change is essential for maintaining sustainable and resilient communities. To better prepare building simulation climate data with urban effects, a computationally efficient approach is used to generate "urbanized" data, where the city's unique signature is obtained through the dynamic Weather Research and Forecasting model for the Ottawa, Canada region. We demonstrate this process using existing climate data and extend it to prepare projections for scenarios where nature-based solutions, such as increased greenery and albedo, were implemented. The data consists of several 31-year time series of climate variables such as temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, pressure, cloud cover, and precipitation over different global warming thresholds. Such a dataset allows building practitioners to evaluate building performance under both historical and future climate conditions, as well as to evaluate the impacts of nature-based solutions to mitigate future climate change risks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207