MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400363097 · doi:10.14195/1647-8614_56_22

Cosmic Art Pedagogy for the Anthropocene Era

2022· article· en· W4400363097 on OpenAlex
jan jagodzinski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Portuguesa de Pedagogia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnvironmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropoceneCOSMIC cancer databaseAstrobiologyEnvironmental ethicsHistoryAstronomyPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay attempts to shift the ontological ground for art education to think along a cosmology that is adequate for the Anthropocene era. The cosmic-eco-artisan (without authority) is forwarded as an exemplar of what Deleuze and Guattari would call ‘conceptual personae’. Their cosmic geo-philosophy plays a dominant role in this essay. The point is made that each eco-cosmic project is a singularity and context bound. There is no art education or procedural ‘methodology’ per se. Rather, what is necessary is for art pedagogy to address the Anthropocene problematic through artistic cosmic ‘forcework’ via a techné; that is, through apparatuses which bring art and science together. I call this artscience or scienceart depending on where the emphasis is placed. I end this essay with several paradigmatic examples to vivify this thesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it