MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400364081 · doi:10.5194/ems2024-742

Argentina expanding Climate Services Knowledge Frontiers: capacity building for local stakeholders.

2024· preprint· en· W4400364081 on OpenAlexaff
Caterina Cimolai, Anna Boqué-Ciurana, Jon Xavier Olano Pozo, Oriana Cherini, Enric Aguilar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Innovation
Canadian institutionsNetwork for Business Sustainability
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacity buildingBusinessClimate changeEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementRegional scienceNatural resource economicsGeographyEconomic growthEnvironmental scienceEconomicsGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The construction of local capacities related to climate change adaptation, such as climate indicators, is crucial to generate effective strategies against climate hazards. Along these lines, a "Workshop on Co-creation of Climate Indicators" has been conducted in the municipality of Posadas (Misiones, Argentina), adapting the co-creation methodology developed by Font et al. (2021). The purpose was to develop local capacity building, including the provision to participants with WMO competencies for delivering Climate Services. To achieve this, participants acquired skills and abilities that help them think, discuss, define, and compute climate indices to assist decision-making in climate-dependent sectors.The workshop was carried out in collaboration with a local partner, REDAPPE, enabling a comprehensive diagnosis of the territory and all stakeholders involved. Local work and outreach facilitated the participation of stakeholders from the private, public, and civil society sectors. Furthermore, both the provincial government (Misiones Province) and the local government (Posadas municipality) engaged with the process, actively participating and providing support.During the workshop, co-created indicators were generated in different working groups. Additionally, each participant conducted individual work where they explained why they consider the development of such capacities important and how they would apply them in their work. Finally, networks of collaboration and work have been established among participants, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and information among them during and after the workshop. We understand this as a fundamental strength for the construction of effective and coordinated actions in the territory; therefore, part of the process is to ensure the support of the technical team with the participants and their work, as well as the promotion and facilitation of tools for the development of new projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegional Development and InnovationFrench-language works237,207