Allelopathic effect of some invasive plants on germination and growth of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tatricum)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allelopathic compounds released by invasive plants can directly affect neighbouring plants by interfering with their germination and suppressing the growth of seedlings or adult plants. In this study, we investigated the strength of the allelopathic effect of three invasive plants: Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica), Canadian goldenrod (Solidago canadensis) and stinkwort (Dittrichia graveolens) on the germination and early growth of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tatricum). All three aqueous extracts significantly reduced the growth of buckwheat seedlings, but had almost no effect on seed germination. In addition, aqueous extracts obtained from a 2-fold serial dilution of a 10% extract of D. graveolens inhibited the growth of buckwheat seedlings in a dose-dependent manner. The results showed that root length was significantly more reduced than shoot length, while seed germination remained largely unaffected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".