Bulk and Single-cell Transcriptomic Brain Data Identify Overlapping Processes and Cell-types with Human AUD and Mammalian Models of Alcohol Use
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the neurobiological underpinnings of alcohol use disorder (AUD) by integrating bulk and single-cell transcriptomic data from humans, primates, and mice across three brain regions associated with addiction (i.e., prefrontal cortex (PFC), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and central amygdala (CeA)). We compared AUD RNA expression and cell-type abundance from 92 human brain to data from 53 primates and 90 mice engaged in diverse alcohol use paradigms. The findings revealed significant and reproducible correlations between human AUD and mammalian models of alcohol use that vary by tissue, species, and behavioral paradigm. The strongest correlations occurred between primate and mouse models of binge drinking (i.e., high drinking in the dark). Certain primate models demonstrated that the brain RNA correlations with human alcohol use disorder (AUD) were approximately 40% as strong as the correlations observed within human samples themselves. By integrating single-cell transcriptomic data, this study observed decreased oligodendrocyte proportions in the PFC and NAc of human AUD with similar trends in animal models. Gene co-expression network analyses revealed conserved systems associated with human AUD and animal models of heavy/binge alcohol consumption. Gene co-expression networks were enriched for pathways related to inflammation, myelination, and synaptic plasticity and the genes within them accounted for ~20% of the heritability in human alcohol consumption. Identified hub genes were associated with relevant traits (e.g., impulsivity, motivation) in humans and mice. This study sheds light on conserved biological entities underlying AUD and chronic alcohol use, providing insights into the cellular, genetic, and neuromolecular basis across species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".