MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400387678 · doi:10.47363/jccsr/2024(6)286

Fundamentals of Formation and Excretion of Urine: A Pictorial Review

2024· review· en· W4400387678 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Case Studies Reviews & Reports · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenal papillaRenal pelvisKidneyRenal functionUrologyMajor duodenal papillaExcretionUrinary systemRenal medullaUrethraRenal physiologyRenal cortexMedicineUrotheliumMedullaAnatomyUrinary bladderInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Via a pictorial review, we will discuss the complex anatomy and important function of the kidney as it relates to urine formation and excretion. We will introduce the anatomy and function of the renal lobe and review the histology of the renal cortex and medulla, renal tubule, renal papilla, and renal pelvis. We will discuss renal filtration capacity and review the pathway of renal excretion through the ureters, urinary bladder, and urethra

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.349
GPT teacher head0.580
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Case Studies Reviews & ReportsSame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207