Effects of acute hippocampal stimulation in the nonhuman primate penicillin model of temporal lobe seizures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
seizure models. To further evaluate its effects on a pre-clinical model, we characterized the effect of unilateral ADMES in an NHP model of temporal lobe seizures induced by intra-hippocampal injection of penicillin (PCN). Four non-human primates were used for this study in two contemporaneous cohorts. One cohort (n = 3 hemispheres) was implanted with the Medtronic RC + S stimulation (GIN cohort) and recording system connected to two 4-contact ring electrodes to evaluate three unilateral stimulation patterns: 7 Hz Ring ADMES, 20 Hz Dual Ring, and 125 Hz Dual Ring (analog of clinical stimulation). In an additional cohort (EPC cohort, n = 2), two 12-contact segmented electrodes were implanted in the right hippocampus and connected to an externalized recording and stimulation system to allow more flexibility in the stimulation pattern. In this second cohort, 4 variations of stimulation were evaluated (7 Hz Full ADMES, 7 Hz Ring ADMES, 31 Hz Wide Ring, and 31 Hz Dual Ring). In the GIN cohort, we found an increase in seizure frequency and time spent in seizure during the 7 Hz Ring ADMES stimulation compared to the respective post-stimulation. A similar post-stimulation effect was found in the EPC cohort. We also found an increase in seizure frequency during the 7Hz full ADMES compared to the respective post-stimulation. However, we did not find a difference between pre-stimulation and stimulation conditions suggesting a possible post stimulation effect of the 7Hz hippocampal stimulation. In conclusion, in the NHP PCN model of temporal lobe seizures, acute asynchronous hippocampal stimulation was not therapeutic, however, our findings related to the post-stimulation effect can support future studies using hippocampal stimulation for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".