MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400391605 · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2024.06.033

Morphologic Features of Regulated vs. Dysregulated Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography

2024· article· en· W4400391605 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsKensington HealthUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyMedicineOphthalmologyRetinal pigment epitheliumProspective cohort studySubclinical infectionRetinalRetinal detachmentInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

•Morphologic features of regulated and dysregulated retinal detachment (RD) differ.•Dysregulated RRDs are more likely to have outer retinal corrugations.•Regulated RRD occurs in young patients with retinal holes and attached hyaloid.•Dysregulated RRD occurs in patients with vitreous separation and horseshoe tears.•Understanding of the morphological differences in RRD has clinical implications. ObjectiveTo describe varying morphological features of patients with RRD based on the extent of regulation of the subretinal space by the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) pump using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).DesignProspective clinical cohort study.Methods Setting: St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, from August 2020-August 2023.Participants: 120 consecutive eyes with primary RRD.Cohorts: Subclinical, non-progressive, localized RRD defined as regulated vs. acute, progressive, and extensive defined as dysregulated, assessed with SS-OCT.Main Outcome: Morphological features of regulated vs. dysregulated RRDs with SS-OCT.Results19.2% (23/120) of RRDs were classified as regulated and 80.8% (97/120) were dysregulated. The mean age of patients with regulated RRDs was 37.1 years (±13.7 SD) vs. 62.6 years (±11.6SD) for patients with dysregulated RRDs (P < .001). The presence of outer retinal corrugations (ORCs) on OCT was observed in 4.3% (1/23) of regulated vs. 81.4% (79/97) of dysregulated RRDs (P < .001). CME was found in 41.6% (5/12) of regulated RRDs compared to 87.3% (83/95) of dysregulated RRDs (P < .001). ORC presence was an independent predictor of having a dysregulated RRD (P = .02, β = 6.6, 95% CI [1.3-33.2]) when controlling for age, sex, baseline VA, lens status, and RD extent. Among patients with regulated RRDs, 25.0% (3/12) were in Stage 2, 0% (0/16) in Stage 3A, 8.3% (1/12) in Stage 3B, 0% (0/16) in Stage 4, and 66.7% (8/12) in Stage 5. In patients with dysregulated RRDs, 14.7% (14/95) were in Stage 2, 15.7% (15/95) were in Stage 3A, 37.9% (36/95) in Stage 3B, 22.1% (21/95) in Stage 4, and 9.5% (9/95) in Stage 5 (P < .001).ConclusionsThere are significant morphologic differences between regulated and dysregulated RRDs using SS-OCT. ORCs are present in almost all dysregulated cases but in a minority of regulated cases and they are an independent predictor of RPE-photoreceptor regulation status. Demographic and clinical features differentiate regulated and dysregulated RRD and understanding these differences has significant implications for optimal management and postoperative outcomes. To describe varying morphological features of patients with RRD based on the extent of regulation of the subretinal space by the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) pump using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Prospective clinical cohort study. Setting: St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, from August 2020-August 2023. Participants: 120 consecutive eyes with primary RRD. Cohorts: Subclinical, non-progressive, localized RRD defined as regulated vs. acute, progressive, and extensive defined as dysregulated, assessed with SS-OCT. Main Outcome: Morphological features of regulated vs. dysregulated RRDs with SS-OCT. 19.2% (23/120) of RRDs were classified as regulated and 80.8% (97/120) were dysregulated. The mean age of patients with regulated RRDs was 37.1 years (±13.7 SD) vs. 62.6 years (±11.6SD) for patients with dysregulated RRDs (P < .001). The presence of outer retinal corrugations (ORCs) on OCT was observed in 4.3% (1/23) of regulated vs. 81.4% (79/97) of dysregulated RRDs (P < .001). CME was found in 41.6% (5/12) of regulated RRDs compared to 87.3% (83/95) of dysregulated RRDs (P < .001). ORC presence was an independent predictor of having a dysregulated RRD (P = .02, β = 6.6, 95% CI [1.3-33.2]) when controlling for age, sex, baseline VA, lens status, and RD extent. Among patients with regulated RRDs, 25.0% (3/12) were in Stage 2, 0% (0/16) in Stage 3A, 8.3% (1/12) in Stage 3B, 0% (0/16) in Stage 4, and 66.7% (8/12) in Stage 5. In patients with dysregulated RRDs, 14.7% (14/95) were in Stage 2, 15.7% (15/95) were in Stage 3A, 37.9% (36/95) in Stage 3B, 22.1% (21/95) in Stage 4, and 9.5% (9/95) in Stage 5 (P < .001). There are significant morphologic differences between regulated and dysregulated RRDs using SS-OCT. ORCs are present in almost all dysregulated cases but in a minority of regulated cases and they are an independent predictor of RPE-photoreceptor regulation status. Demographic and clinical features differentiate regulated and dysregulated RRD and understanding these differences has significant implications for optimal management and postoperative outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it