MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400400937 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59543-1_2

The Crime-Crypto Nexus: Nuancing Risk Across Crypto-Crime Transactions

2024· book-chapter· en· W4400400937 on OpenAlex
Rhianna Hamilton, Christian Leuprecht

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIus gentium · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryptocurrencyCybercrimeNexus (standard)Computer securityEvasion (ethics)HackerOrganised crimeChild pornographyBusinessSanctionsCriminologyInternet privacyThe InternetPolitical scienceLawComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Cryptocurrency is supercharging illicit activities by transnational criminal networks, including terrorism, drug trafficking, pornography, sanctions evasion, and ransomware. Yet, mainstream cryptocurrency literature often overlooks this criminal association. The relatively new and transboundary nature of cryptocurrency is restructuring criminal activities. Hacking has emerged as a digital-age bank heist, siphoning off substantial sums from exchange platforms. Crypto crime is dynamic, transitioning from primarily placing and layering the proceeds of precursor crimes into the financial system to a burgeoning trend of stealing virtual currency. While not every online financial crime involves cryptocurrency, the proliferation of crypto-enabled cybercrimes is exponential. Paradoxically, existing literature largely disregards how cryptocurrency-enabled offenses such as Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (OCSEA), sanctions evasion, and ransomware.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it