MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction to the Seventh Volume of Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching

2024· article· en· W4400405239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers on postsecondary learning and teaching. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)Mathematics educationPostsecondary educationPsychologyHigher educationPolitical sciencePhysicsThermodynamicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

began the global transition, swift and unexpected, to online teaching and learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic.With time, reflection, and opportunities for research, academics have begun to document the impact on teaching and learning in higher education.Papers in volume seven were developed from presentations at the 2023 University of Calgary Conference on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching.Presenters were invited to explore the conference theme "Lessons learned on how blended and online learning changed postsecondary education" and the multiple aspects of the collective transformation experienced since the spring of 2020.Authors in this volume contribute their perspectives, practices, experiences, and scholarship related to the COVID-19 pandemic and how they, students, and their institutions adapted, thrived, and ultimately transformed or informed postsecondary teaching and learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it