Quantitative Analysis of Miniature Synaptic Calcium Transients Using Positive Unlabeled Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ca 2+ imaging methods are widely used for studying cellular activity in the brain, allowing detailed analysis of dynamic processes across various scales. Enhanced by high-contrast optical microscopy and fluorescent Ca 2+ sensors, this technique can be used to reveal localized Ca 2+ fluctuations within neurons, including in sub-cellular compartments, such as the dendritic shaft or spines. Despite advances in Ca 2+ sensors, the analysis of miniature Synaptic Calcium Transients (mSCTs), characterized by variability in morphology and low signal-to-noise ratios, remains challenging. Traditional threshold-based methods struggle with the detection and segmentation of these small, dynamic events. Deep learning (DL) approaches offer promising solutions but are limited by the need for large annotated datasets. Positive Unlabeled (PU) learning addresses this limitation by leveraging unlabeled instances to increase dataset size and enhance performance. This approach is particularly useful in the case of mSCTs that are scarce and small, associated with a very small proportion of the foreground pixels. PU learning significantly increases the effective size of the training dataset, improving model performance. Here, we present a PU learning-based strategy for detecting and segmenting mSCTs. We evaluate the performance of two 3D deep learning models, StarDist-3D and 3D U-Net, which are well established for the segmentation of small volumetric structures in microscopy datasets. By integrating PU learning, we enhance the 3D U-Net’s performance, demonstrating significant gains over traditional methods. This work pioneers the application of PU learning in Ca 2+ imaging analysis, offering a robust framework for mSCT detection and segmentation. We also demonstrate how this quantitative analysis pipeline can be used for subsequent mSCTs feature analysis. We characterize morphological and kinetic changes of mSCTs associated with the application of chemical long-term potentiation (cLTP) stimulation in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Our data-driven approach shows that a cLTP-inducing stimulus leads to the emergence of new active dendritic regions and differently affects mSCTs subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".