MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400407822 · doi:10.1002/anie.202408443

3D Lead‐Organoselenide‐Halide Perovskites and their Mixed‐Chalcogenide and Mixed‐Halide Alloys

2024· article· en· W4400407822 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jiayi Li, Yang Wang, Santanu Saha, Zhihengyu Chen, Jan P. Hofmann, Jason Misleh, Karena W. Chapman, Jeffrey A. Reimer, Marina R. Filip, Hemamala I. Karunadasa

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of ChemistryArgonne National LaboratoryDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber SystemsEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilOffice of ScienceBrown FoundationUniversity of OxfordSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungU.S. Department of EnergyUniversity of AlbertaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsHalideChalcogenideMaterials sciencePerovskite (structure)Lead (geology)Inorganic chemistryOptoelectronicsChemistryCrystallographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We incorporate Se into the 3D halide perovskite framework using the zwitterionic ligand: SeCYS ( + NH 3 (CH 2 ) 2 Se − ), which occupies both the X − and A + sites in the prototypical ABX 3 perovskite. The new organoselenide‐halide perovskites: (SeCYS)PbX 2 (X=Cl, Br) expand upon the recently discovered organosulfide‐halide perovskites. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and pair distribution function analysis reveal the average structures of the organoselenide‐halide perovskites, whereas the local lead coordination environments and their distributions were probed through solid‐state 77 Se and 207 Pb NMR, complemented by theoretical simulations. Density functional theory calculations illustrate that the band structures of (SeCYS)PbX 2 largely resemble those of their S analogs, with similar band dispersion patterns, yet with a considerable band gap decrease. Optical absorbance measurements indeed show band gaps of 2.07 and 1.86 eV for (SeCYS)PbX 2 with X=Cl and Br, respectively. We further demonstrate routes to alloying the halides (Cl, Br) and chalcogenides (S, Se) continuously tuning the band gap from 1.86 to 2.31 eV–straddling the ideal range for tandem solar cells or visible‐light photocatalysis. The comprehensive description of the average and local structures, and how they can fine‐tune the band gap and potential trap states, respectively, establishes the foundation for understanding this new perovskite family, which combines solid‐state and organo‐main‐group chemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207