AutoTomo: Learning-Based Traffic Estimator Incorporating Network Tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estimating the Traffic Matrix (TM) is a critical yet resource-intensive process in network management. With the advent of deep learning models, we now have the potential to learn the inverse mapping from link loads to origin-destination (OD) flows more efficiently and accurately. However, a significant hurdle is that all current learning-based techniques necessitate a training dataset covering a comprehensive TM for a specific duration. This requirement is often unfeasible in practical scenarios. This paper addresses this complex learning challenge, specifically when dealing with incomplete and biased TM data. Our initial approach involves parameterizing the unidentified flows, thereby transforming this problem of target-deficient learning into an empirical optimization problem that integrates tomography constraints. Following this, we introduce AutoTomo, a learning-based architecture designed to optimize both the inverse mapping and the unexplored flows during the model’s training phase. We also propose an innovative observation selection algorithm, which aids network operators in gathering the most insightful measurements with limited device resources. We evaluate AutoTomo with three public traffic datasets Abilene, GÉANT and Cernet. The results reveal that AutoTomo outperforms five state-of-the-art learning-based TM estimation techniques. With complete training data, AutoTomo enhances the accuracy of the most efficient method by 15%, while it shows an improvement between 30% to 56% with incomplete training data. Furthermore, AutoTomo exhibits rapid testing speed, making it a viable tool for real-time TM estimation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".