A low-cost IoT-based deep learning method of water gauge measurement for flood monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real-time and accurate measurement of the water level is a critical step in flood monitoring and management of water resources. In recent years, with the advent of the Internet of Things (IoTs) and cloud computing platforms and resources, the surveillance technology for water monitoring has been revolutionized due to the availability of high-resolution and portable cameras, robust image processing techniques, and cloud-enabled data fusion centers. However, despite the potential advantages of online water level monitoring of the rivers and lakes, some technical challenges need to be addressed before they can be fully utilized. Submersible sensor devices are frequently used for measuring water levels but are prone to damage from sediment deposition and many gauge detection techniques are inefficient at nighttime. In response, this paper presents a novel Internet of Things (IoT) based deep learning methodology that uses Mask-RCNN to accurately segment gauges from images even when there are distortions present. An automated and immediate water stage estimate is provided by this simple, low-cost method. The methodology’s applicability to water resource management systems and flood disaster prevention engineering opens up new possibilities for the deployment of intelligent IoT-based flood monitoring systems in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".