Evaluation of Total Risk-Weighted Assets in Islamic Banking through Fintech Innovations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The assessment of total risk-weighted assets (LTRWAs) in the banking sector is of the utmost importance. It serves as a critical component for regulatory compliance, risk management, and capital adequacy. By accurately assessing LTRWAs, banks can effectively meet regulatory requirements, efficiently allocate capital resources, and proactively manage risks. Moreover, the accurate assessment of LTRWAs supports performance evaluation and fosters investor confidence in the financial stability of banks. This study presents statistical analyses and machine learning methods to identify factors influencing LTRWAs. Data from Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen, spanning from 2010 to 2021, was utilized. Various statistical tests and models, including ordinary least squares, fixed effect, random effect, correlation, variance inflation factor, tolerance tests, and fintech models, were conducted. The results indicated significant impacts of the unemployment rate, inflation rate, natural logarithm of the loan-to-asset ratio, and natural logarithm of total assets on LTRWAs in regression models. The dataset was divided into a training group (90% of the data) and a testing group (10% of the data) to evaluate the predictive capabilities of various fintech models, including an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), a hybrid neural fuzzy inference system (HyFIS), a fuzzy system with the heuristic gradient descent (FS.HGD), and fuzzy inference rules with the descent method (FIR.DM) models. The selection of the optimal model is contingent upon assessing its performance according to specific error criteria. The HyFIS model outperformed others with lower errors in predicting LTRWAs. Independent t-tests confirmed statistically significant differences between original and predicted LTRWA for all models, with HyFIS showing closer predictions. This study provides valuable insights into LTRWA prediction using advanced statistical and machine learning techniques, based on a dataset from multiple countries and years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".