MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400413843 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2024.2371359

Cumulative Changes in Minimum Snow/Ice Extent over Canada and Northern USA for 2000–2023

2024· article· en· W4400413843 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alexander P. Trishchenko, Calin Ungureanu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowGeographyPhysical geographyClimatologyEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Minimum Snow/Ice (MSI) extent is an important climate and environmental indicator related to surface hydrology and freshwater resources. Variations in the MSI extent over the four first-order regions (1-4) included in the Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) for Canada and the Northern USA were analyzed in this study using an improved land-water mask to better discriminate landfast ice in the high Arctic coastal zone. The analysis utilized warm season snow/ice probability maps derived from MODIS clear-sky composite imagery at a 250-m spatial resolution. Results showed statistically significant declining trends in the minimum snow/ice extent with the average value of the slope for the entire area (-1,177.7 ± 362.8) km2/yr. The variations in MSI extent are well correlated with surface air temperature. The correlation coefficients are statistically significant, ranging from −0.79 to −0.82. The detailed analysis revealed a reduction of the area with snow/ice probability 100% over the RGI glaciated zones, while areas with lower probability values were increasing in size, which may be interpreted as an indication of general glacier shrinkage over the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207