Control-free and efficient integrated photonic neural networks via hardware-aware training and pruning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrated photonic neural networks (PNNs) are at the forefront of AI computing, leveraging light’s unique properties, such as large bandwidth, low latency, and potentially low power consumption. Nevertheless, the integrated optical components are inherently sensitive to external disturbances, thermal interference, and various device imperfections, which detrimentally affect computing accuracy and reliability. Conventional solutions use complicated control methods to stabilize optical devices and chip, which result in high hardware complexity and are impractical for large-scale PNNs. To address this, we propose a training approach to enable control-free, accurate, and energy-efficient photonic computing without adding hardware complexity. The core idea is to train the parameters of a physical neural network towards its noise-robust and energy-efficient region. Our method is validated on different integrated PNN architectures and is applicable to solve various device imperfections in thermally tuned PNNs and PNNs based on phase change materials. A notable 4-bit improvement is achieved in micro-ring resonator-based PNNs without needing complex device control or power-hungry temperature stabilization circuits. Additionally, our approach reduces the energy consumption by tenfold. This advancement represents a significant step towards the practical, energy-efficient, and noise-resilient implementation of large-scale integrated PNNs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".