MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400420597 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.047

A New Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Heterogeneous Multi-service Hybrid Migration in Edge Computing

2024· article· en· W4400420597 on OpenAlexaff
Arshin Rezazadeh, Hanan Lutfiyya

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionInternet of ThingsDistributed computingService (business)Feature (linguistics)Contrast (vision)Data scienceArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating cloud, fog, and edge computing with future Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices and their applications in 5G/6G networks will become more feasible soon. This research analyzes the effectiveness of the Hybrid-MiGrror and hybrid-copy migration methods in scenarios involving heterogeneous multiple VMs/containers. This research introduces mathematical models for the Hybrid-MiGrror approach and offers suggestions and comparisons for migrating services to be deployed as multiple services. The model’s notable feature is its ability to use both average and non-average values for various parameters during migration, resulting in enhanced and more precise outcomes. In contrast, previous hybrid migration studies mostly rely only on average values. This study demonstrates that relying solely on average parameter values in hybrid migration can result in imprecise outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia Computer ScienceSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207