MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400420597 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.047

A New Comprehensive Mathematical Model for Heterogeneous Multi-service Hybrid Migration in Edge Computing

2024· article· en· W4400420597 on OpenAlex
Arshin Rezazadeh, Hanan Lutfiyya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingEdge computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionInternet of ThingsDistributed computingService (business)Feature (linguistics)Contrast (vision)Data scienceArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating cloud, fog, and edge computing with future Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices and their applications in 5G/6G networks will become more feasible soon. This research analyzes the effectiveness of the Hybrid-MiGrror and hybrid-copy migration methods in scenarios involving heterogeneous multiple VMs/containers. This research introduces mathematical models for the Hybrid-MiGrror approach and offers suggestions and comparisons for migrating services to be deployed as multiple services. The model’s notable feature is its ability to use both average and non-average values for various parameters during migration, resulting in enhanced and more precise outcomes. In contrast, previous hybrid migration studies mostly rely only on average values. This study demonstrates that relying solely on average parameter values in hybrid migration can result in imprecise outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it