PID‐Based Freeway Work Zone Merge Control with Traffic State Prediction under Mixed Traffic Flow of Connected Automated Vehicles and Manual Vehicles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During road work, lane closures significantly reduce road capacity and negatively impact traffic safety in the upstream segments. This study introduces a merge control strategy for the work zone on freeway that aims to alleviate severe congestion and improve flow efficiency in environments where manual vehicles (MVs) and connected automated vehicles (CAVs) coexist. Using a short‐term prediction model combined with a proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID) controller, this strategy dynamically adjusts merging behavior based on real‐time traffic conditions. The PID controller calculates error values as the difference between current and target states, adjusting responses through proportional, integral, and derivative terms. The predictions of the traffic state based on the density of open lanes in each segment guide the controller’s decision to initiate a “Merge” or “No Merge” guidance. When merging is deemed necessary, the controller estimates the optimal number of vehicles to merge for each segment, using the severe congestion threshold as a reference point. This approach was tested using a microscopic simulation tool on a calibrated real‐world network under mixed traffic conditions. The results indicate that the proposed strategy effectively disperses merging upstream, increases merging speeds, and maintains lane density below critical congestion levels, thus enhancing operation efficiency and safety in work zone areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".