MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400434833 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450778

A spectroscopic and kinematic survey of fast hot subdwarfs

2024· preprint· en· W4400434833 on OpenAlexfundno aff
U. Heber, A. Irrgang, M. Dorsch, A. Bastian, P. Neunteufel, Thomas Kupfer, S. Bloemen, S. Kreuzer, Lis Møller, M. Schindewolf, D. P. Schneider, E. Ziegerer, Ingrid Pelisoli, V. Schaffenroth, B. N. Barlow, R. Raddi, S. Geier, Nicole Reindl, T. Rauch, Péter Németh, B. T. Gänsicke

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderOffice of ScienceFermilabMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftChinese Academy of SciencesInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoEuropean Southern ObservatoryDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtMax-Planck-GesellschaftAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaYork UniversityMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoGeneralitat de CatalunyaEuropean CommissionUniversity of OxfordUniversität BaselLeibniz-GemeinschaftGrantová Agentura České RepublikyUniversity of Notre DameNational Science FoundationCase Western Reserve UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WashingtonPrinceton UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of PortsmouthNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityVanderbilt UniversityDrexel UniversityU.S. Naval ObservatoryYale UniversityU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationW. M. Keck FoundationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyAgencia Estatal de Investigación
KeywordsKinematicsAstrophysicsPhysicsAstronomyGeologyClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hot subdwarfs (sdO/B) are the stripped helium cores of red giants formed via binary interactions. Close hot subdwarf binaries with massive white dwarf companions have been proposed as possible progenitors of thermonuclear supernovae type Ia (SN Ia). If the supernova is triggered by stable mass transfer from the helium star, the companion should survive the explosion and should be accelerated to high velocities. The hypervelocity star US 708 is regarded as the prototype for such an ejected companion. To find more of those objects we conducted an extensive spectroscopic survey. Candidates for such fast stars have been selected from the spectroscopic database of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and several ground-based proper-motion surveys. Follow-up spectroscopy has been obtained with several 4m- to 10m-class telescopes. Combining the results from quantitative spectroscopic analyses with space-based astrometry from Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) we determined the atmospheric and kinematic parameters of 53 fast hot subdwarf stars. None of these stars is unbound to the Galaxy, although some have Galactic restframe velocities close to the Galactic escape velocity. 21 stars are apparently single objects, that crossed the Galactic disc within their lifetimes in the sdO/B stage and could be regarded as potential candidates for the SN Ia ejection scenario. However, the properties of the full sample are more consistent with a pure old Galactic halo population. We therefore conclude that the fast sdO/B stars we found are likely to be extreme halo stars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements→French-language works237,207→