Evaluating the Adoption of mHealth Technologies by Community Health Workers to Improve the Use of Maternal Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited information exists on the impact of mobile health (mHealth) use by community health workers (CHWs) on improving the use of maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review addresses 2 objectives: evaluating the impact of mHealth use by CHWs on antenatal care (ANC) use, facility-based births, and postnatal care (PNC) use in SSA; and identifying facilitators and barriers to mHealth use by CHWs in programs designed to increase ANC use, facility-based births, and PNC use in SSA using a sociotechnical system approach. METHODS: We searched for articles in 6 databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Africa Index Medicus) from inception up to September 2022, with additional articles identified from Google Scholar. After article selection, 2 independent reviewers performed title and abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction using Covidence software (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd). In addition, we manually screened the references lists of the included articles. Finally, we performed a narrative synthesis of the outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 2594 records retrieved, 10 (0.39%) studies (n=22, 0.85% articles) met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. The studies were published between 2012 and 2022 in 6 countries. Of the studies reporting on ANC outcomes, 43% (3/7) reported that mHealth use by CHWs increased ANC use. Similarly, of the studies reporting on facility-based births, 89% (8/9) demonstrated an increase due to mHealth use by CHWs. In addition, in the PNC studies, 75% (3/4) showed increased PNC use associated with mHealth use by CHWs. Many of the studies reported on the importance of addressing factors related to the social environment of mHealth-enabled CHWs, including the perception of CHWs by the community, trust, relationships, digital literacy, training, mentorship and supervision, skills, CHW program ownership, and the provision of incentives. Very few studies reported on how program goals and culture influenced mHealth use by CHWs. Providing free equipment, accessories, and internet connectivity while addressing ongoing challenges with connectivity, power, the ease of using mHealth software, and equipment maintenance support allowed mHealth-enabled CHW programs to thrive. CONCLUSIONS: mHealth use by CHWs was associated with an increase in ANC use, facility-based births, and PNC use in SSA. Identifying and addressing social and technical barriers to the use of mHealth is essential to ensure the success of mHealth programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022346364; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=346364.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.069 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".