Multi-planar dual adversarial network based on dynamic 3D features for MRI-CT head and neck image synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Head and neck radiotherapy planning requires electron densities from different tissues for dose calculation. Dose calculation from imaging modalities such as MRI remains an unsolved problem since this imaging modality does not provide information about the density of electrons. Approach. We propose a generative adversarial network (GAN) approach that synthesizes CT (sCT) images from T1-weighted MRI acquisitions in head and neck cancer patients. Our contribution is to exploit new features that are relevant for improving multimodal image synthesis, and thus improving the quality of the generated CT images. More precisely, we propose a Dual branch generator based on the U-Net architecture and on an augmented multi-planar branch. The augmented branch learns specific 3D dynamic features, which describe the dynamic image shape variations and are extracted from different view-points of the volumetric input MRI. The architecture of the proposed model relies on an end-to-end convolutional U-Net embedding network. Results. The proposed model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 18.76 ± 5.167 in the target Hounsfield unit (HU) space on sagittal head and neck patients, with a mean structural similarity (MSSIM) of 0.95 ± 0.09 and a Frechet inception distance (FID) of 145.60 ± 8.38 . The model yields a MAE of 26.83 ± 8.27 to generate specific primary tumor regions on axial patient acquisitions, with a Dice score of 0.73 ± 0.06 and a FID distance equal to 122.58 ± 7.55 . The improvement of our model over other state-of-the-art GAN approaches is of 3.8%, on a tumor test set. On both sagittal and axial acquisitions, the model yields the best peak signal-to-noise ratio of 27.89 ± 2.22 and 26.08 ± 2.95 to synthesize MRI from CT input. Significance. The proposed model synthesizes both sagittal and axial CT tumor images, used for radiotherapy treatment planning in head and neck cancer cases. The performance analysis across different imaging metrics and under different evaluation strategies demonstrates the effectiveness of our dual CT synthesis model to produce high quality sCT images compared to other state-of-the-art approaches. Our model could improve clinical tumor analysis, in which a further clinical validation remains to be explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".