MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Skill Expectation for Managers

2024· article· en· W4400442158 on OpenAlexaff
Shinan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Employability
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study shows that organizations vary in their skill expectations for managers due to different levels of social trust. When employers have weaker trust in the local population, they expect managers to possess a higher level of technical skills, so that they could closely guide and supervise workers. But when the trust is strong, organizations place a greater emphasis on managers’ social skills, as they are expected to collaborate with and coordinate among workers who are given more discretion. To test this proposition, we analyze employers’ skill expectations using 40 thousand managerial jobs posted by multi-national firms in the digital sectors of 21 European Union countries. Our strictest analytical models rely on bilateral trust measures to predict skill expectations for managers, including fixed effects on country, firm, and occupation. This study demonstrates the role of social trust in shaping expected managerial roles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicHigher Education and EmployabilityFrench-language works237,207