MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In the Wake of Digitalization: Examining Processes and Tensions of Technological Change

2024· article· en· W4400442750 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Lauren Nelson, Hatim A. Rahman, Susan Scott, Stella Pachidi, Lior Zalmanson, Shani Evenstein Sigalov, Virginia Leavell

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Technological Innovation
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWakeEconomic geographyPolitical scienceGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This symposium examines the myriad consequences wrought by digital transformations in organizations and industries: intended, unintended, and corollary. As categorized by Scott and Orlikowski (2022), intended consequences generated through technological change are usually visible and anticipated; unintended consequences are similarly visible and direct, but unanticipated; and less visible, indirect corollary effects occur when digitalization challenges institutional values, norms, and rules in industries, potentially displacing them. Papers in this symposium address research questions related to knowledge production, workers’ mobility in labor markets, and change management, all with respect to how digitalization transforms organizations and industries. By exploring these questions in research contexts such as Wikipedia, digital labor markets, information services, and agencies that maintain public infrastructure, this symposium advances research on how digitalization transforms industries in not only a direct, but also indirect, pathways. By grappling with different kinds of “changes occurring at some temporal and spatial remove from the main events” (Orlikowski & Scott, 2023, 2), the four papers in this symposium provide the opportunity to clarify and build on conceptual differences among different types of technological changes and their outcomes using examples of industries being digitalized. Anticipating the future of Wikipedia’s regime of knowing in the GenAI era Author: Shani Evenstein Sigalov; Tel Aviv U. Author: Lior Zalmanson; Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv U. Author: Stella Pachidi; U. of Cambridge Examining Workers’ Mobility in Online Labor Markets Author: Hatim A. Rahman; Northwestern Kellogg School of Management Anticipatory Control in the Digital Transformation of Water Infrastructure Author: Virginia Leavell; Cambridge Judge Business School Software as subterfuge for subordination: Unintended consequences of digitalization in a library Author: Jennifer Lauren Nelson; U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicEconomic and Technological InnovationFrench-language works237,207