Conceptualizing the Role of Ideational Bricolage in Social Value Creation for the Marginalized
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper devotes attention to three key entities: social enterprise, bricolage, and the marginalized. First, it reviews the extant literature on the intersections of social enterprise and marginalization and argues for a holistic social entrepreneurial system that accommodates and represents marginalization on all fronts. As a response, the ‘by, of, and for’ vantage point is established. Second, it recognizes that, while the use of bricolage is becoming increasingly popular in social enterprises, there is a void in the exploration and theorization of ideational bricolage, a type of bricolage that considers as inputs the cultural, normative, and symbolic elements. Third, it brings together the concept of ideational bricolage and the newly developed vantage point to build the by, of, and for model of ideational bricolage. Finally, based on the freshly produced conceptual model, it lays out a few research propositions and discusses potential paths for future research on ideational bricolage and social enterprises. Keywords: social enterprise, marginalization, ideational bricolage, social value creation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".