ZTCloudGuard: Zero Trust Context-Aware Access Management Framework to Avoid Medical Errors in the Era of Generative AI and Cloud-Based Health Information Ecosystems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Managing access between large numbers of distributed medical devices has become a crucial aspect of modern healthcare systems, enabling the establishment of smart hospitals and telehealth infrastructure. However, as telehealth technology continues to evolve and Internet of Things (IoT) devices become more widely used, they are also increasingly exposed to various types of vulnerabilities and medical errors. In healthcare information systems, about 90% of vulnerabilities emerge from medical error and human error. As a result, there is a need for additional research and development of security tools to prevent such attacks. This article proposes a zero-trust-based context-aware framework for managing access to the main components of the cloud ecosystem, including users, devices, and output data. The main goal and benefit of the proposed framework is to build a scoring system to prevent or alleviate medical errors while using distributed medical devices in cloud-based healthcare information systems. The framework has two main scoring criteria to maintain the chain of trust. First, it proposes a critical trust score based on cloud-native microservices for authentication, encryption, logging, and authorizations. Second, a bond trust scoring system is created to assess the real-time semantic and syntactic analysis of attributes stored in a healthcare information system. The analysis is based on a pre-trained machine learning model that generates the semantic and syntactic scores. The framework also takes into account regulatory compliance and user consent in the creation of the scoring system. The advantage of this method is that it applies to any language and adapts to all attributes, as it relies on a language model, not just a set of predefined and limited attributes. The results show a high F1 score of 93.5%, which proves that it is valid for detecting medical errors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it