Pragmatist Foundations of Research on Entrepreneurial Strategy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
American pragmatism provides a rich intellectual foundation that accommodates diverse practices in service of “usefulness” and as such is well-suited to examine formation of entrepreneurial strategies that aim at changing the status quo, while facing fundamental uncertainty associated with such attempts. Research on entrepreneurial strategy drawing on pragmatism is burgeoning but remains dispersed across research communities. For example, one branch of such research focuses on how entrepreneurs adapt and evolve their ideas using scientific reasoning to test beliefs about (future) states of the world, while another branch focuses on the generative power of entrepreneurial agency employing abductive reasoning for creative world-making. There is, however, substantial potential for cross-pollination between such branches. This symposium will bring together a diverse group of leading scholars from these areas of research, to create a common ground of key pragmatist assumptions, raise open questions for future studies examining the phenomenon of entrepreneurial strategy formation, and chart opportunities for a fruitful (joint) research program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it