MRI-Derived Modeling of Disease Progression Patterns in Patients With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is assumed to follow a steady course that is similar across patients. To date, phenotypic and temporal diversities of TLE evolution remain unknown. In this study, we aimed at simultaneously characterizing these sources of variability based on cross-sectional data. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients with TLE referred for evaluation by neurologists to the Montreal Neurological Institute epilepsy clinic, who underwent in-patient video EEG monitoring and multimodal imaging at 3 Tesla, comprising 3D T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and 2D diffusion-weighted MRI. The cohort included patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and patients with drug-responsive epilepsy. The neuropsychological evaluation included Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III and Leonard tapping task. The control group consisted of participants without TLE recruited through advertisement and who underwent the same MRI acquisition as patients. Based on surface-based analysis of key MRI markers of pathology (gray matter morphology and white matter microstructure), the Subtype and Stage Inference algorithm estimated subtypes and stages of brain pathology to which individual patients were assigned. The number of subtypes was determined by running the algorithm 100 times and estimating mean and SD of disease trajectories and the consistency of patients' assignments based on 1,000 bootstrap samples. Effect of normal aging was subtracted from patients. We examined associations with clinical and cognitive parameters and utility for individualized predictions. RESULTS: < 0.05 across all comparisons. DISCUSSION: Cross-sectional MRI-derived models provide reliable prognostic markers of TLE disease evolution, which follows distinct trajectories, each associated with divergent patterns of hippocampal and whole-brain structural alterations, as well as cognitive and clinical profiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".