Deep Learning Used with a Colorimetric Sensor Array to Detect Indole for Nondestructive Monitoring of Shrimp Freshness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde (PDL)-doped poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and chitosan (Chit) for the quantitative analysis of indole, which is an indicator of shrimp freshness. As a result of indole simulation, the array strip turned from faint yellow to pink or mulberry color with the increasing indole concentration, like a progress bar. The indicator film exhibited excellent permeability, mechanical and thermal stability, and color responsiveness to indole, which was attributed to the interactions between PDL and Chit/PVA. Furthermore, the colorimetric strip sensor array provided a good relationship between the indole concentration and the color intensity within a range of 50-350 ppb. The pathogens and spoilage bacteria of shrimp possessed the ability to produce indole, which caused the color changes of the strip sensor array. In the shrimp freshness monitoring experiment, the color-changing progress of the strip sensor array was in agreement with the simulation and could distinguish the shrimp freshness levels. The image classification system based on deep learning were developed, the accuracies of four DCNN algorithms are above 90%, with VGG16 achieving the highest accuracy at 97.89%. Consequently, a "progress bar" strip sensor array has the potential to realize nondestructive, more precise, and commercially available food freshness monitoring using simple visual inspection and intelligent equipment identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".