Long-Term Airport Network Performance Forecasting With Linear Diffusion Graph Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precise forecasting of airport performances, such as landing rates and delays, is essential for the smooth operation of air traffic management systems and for improving the passenger experience. While current efforts predominantly address short-term predictions, the imperative for long-term forecasting is undeniable, particularly for strategic operational planning and resource management. Equally important is the explainability of these forecasts, which is critical for effective decision-making. To meet these needs, our study introduces an innovative approach to airport performance forecasting with the Linear-Diffusion Graph Network (LDGN), an explainable and probabilistic model. The LDGN is intricately structured, comprising stacked temporal linear layers and graph diffusion layers that harness the clarity of linear time series models. This configuration adeptly captures the nuanced interactions between graph-based diffusion processes and the dynamic spread of conditions across airport performances. Departing from conventional point forecasts, the LDGN produces a probabilistic output, prioritizing predictability and a strong capacity for generalization. The model’s pre-training is enhanced with stochastic mask reconstruction, a technique that significantly improves its ability to generalize. Through rigorous testing on real-world datasets, we have validated the LDGN’s superior performance in both long-term and very long-term forecasting. Our results demonstrate not only high accuracy and explainability but also a robust capacity for uncertainty quantification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it