MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400448161 · doi:10.1080/15376494.2024.2373975

Uniform elastic field inside an elliptical inhomogeneity with Neuber’s nonlinear stress–strain law under generalized plane strain deformations

2024· article· en· W4400448161 on OpenAlexafffund
Xu Wang, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueMechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlane stressNonlinear systemField (mathematics)Strain (injury)Stress–strain curveStress (linguistics)Stress fieldMaterials sciencePlane (geometry)Structural engineeringMechanicsDeformation (meteorology)GeometryMathematicsPhysicsFinite element methodEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove the uniformity of the in-plane and anti-plane elastic field of stresses and strains inside an incompressible nonlinear elastic elliptical inhomogeneity embedded in an infinite linear isotropic elastic matrix subjected to uniform remote in-plane and anti-plane stresses. The elastic material occupying the elliptical inhomogeneity obeys Neuber’s special nonlinear stress-strain law. The original boundary value problem is finally reduced to a single non-linear equation for the constant effective strain within the inhomogeneity, which is rigorously proved to have a unique solution. Once the non-linear equation is solved numerically, we establish the uniform elastic field within the elliptical inhomogeneity and the non-uniform elastic field in the linear elastic matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMechanics of Advanced Materials and StructuresSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207