A dynamic compartmental model of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for biological phosphorus removal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Bioreactors are usually modelled as continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) or CSTRs connected in series (Tanks-In-Series configuration). In large systems with non-ideal mixing, such approaches do not sufficiently capture the complex hydrodynamics, leading to model inaccuracies due to the lumping of spatial gradients. Highly detailed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models provide insight into complex hydrodynamics but are computationally too expensive for flow-sheet models and digital twin applications. A compartmental model (CM) can be a middle-ground by providing a more realistic representation of the hydrodynamics and still being computationally affordable. However, the hydrodynamics of a plant can be very different under varying flow conditions. Dynamic CMs can capture these changes in an elegant way. So far, the application of CMs has been limited mostly to continuous flow systems. In this study, a dynamic CM of a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is developed for a bio-P removal process. The SBR comes with challenges for CM development due to its distinct operational stages. The dynamic CM shows significant improvements over the CSTR model (using the same biokinetic parameters) for dissolved oxygen and phosphate predictions reducing the need for model recalibration that can lead to over-fitting and limited extrapolation capability of the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".