MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400452955 · doi:10.7202/1112372ar

Les enjeux d’équité, diversité et inclusion au coeur du monde académique et d’établissements de santé

2024· article· fr· W4400452955 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maria Cecília Bueno Jayme Gallani, Sophie Brière

Bibliographic record

VenueScience of Nursing and Health Practices · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Workforce Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)HumanitiesEquity (law)SociologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les enjeux d’équité, diversité et inclusion au coeur du monde académique et d’établissements de santé / Equity, Diversity and Inclusion at the Heart of the Academic World and Healthcare Settings. An article from journal Science of Nursing and Health Practices / Science infirmière et pratiques en santé (Volume 7, Number 1, 2024, pp. 1-113), on Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.999
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.026
Scholarly communication0.0140.015
Open science0.0010.013
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.567
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience of Nursing and Health PracticesSame topicGlobal Health Workforce IssuesFrench-language works237,207