MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400453230 · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2024-sdc.123

124 Development and implementation of a patient decision aid on post-vasectomy semen analysis

2024· article· en· W4400453230 on OpenAlexaffabout
Happy Tahirih Kampire, Souleymane Diabaté, Jonathan Cloutier, Michel Dallaire, Simon Plourde, Michel Labrecque

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMale Reproductive Health Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasectomyComputer scienceSemen analysisSemenGynecologyMedicineFamily planningAndrologyResearch methodologyInfertilityBiologyEnvironmental healthPopulationPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction A semen analysis is recommended three months after vasectomy to assess the success of the procedure. However, typically in North America, only 55–71% of vasectomized men comply with the prescribed test. According to the Ottawa Decision Support Model (ODSM), deciding whether to do a post- vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) or not is a ’difficult’ decision. Our study aimed to create a patient decision aid (PtDA) and implement it in the practice of Vasectomie Québec, Canada’s most important vasectomy provider. Methodology The development of the PtDA was based on the ODSM framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) criteria, using the literature on the determinants of compliance to PVSA and Vasectomie Québec statistics on the effectiveness of vasectomy. Results The PtDA provides information on PVSA, vasectomy success/failure probabilities (including a pictogram), reasons for choosing to do the test or not, and resources to facilitate an informed decision. It was tested with 57 vasectomized men at Vasectomie Québec. Men regarded the PtDA as informative (95%) and helpful in understanding the merits and drawbacks associated with each option (98%). It facilitated clarification of their priorities (93%), the certainty of their decision (89%), and their deliberation (90%). Respondents expressed satisfaction with the tool, citing its user-friendliness (90%), clear presentation (98%), and appropriate font length (81%) and size (94%). Most reported that the language (98%) and statistical information (96%) were clear and easy to understand. Between October 2022 and September 2023, Vasectomie Québec supplied the final PtDA to over 4,700 vasectomized men. Conclusion A PtDA on PVSA was successfully developed and implemented in a large vasectomy clinic in Canada. It could be adapted to other settings according to their success/failure statistics and access to PVSA. An evaluation of the impact of the PtDA on decision-making and compliance is underway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.070
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.070
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.431 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMale Reproductive Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207