MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400455996 · doi:10.1038/s41529-024-00491-5

Author Correction: Ion migration mechanisms in the early stages of drying and degradation of oil paint films

2024· article· en· W4400455996 on OpenAlex
Margherita Gnemmi, Laura Fuster‐López, Marion F. Mecklenburg, Alison Murray, Sarah Sands, Greg Watson, Francesca Caterina Izzo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Materials Degradation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Computer graphics (images)ReflectivityBar (unit)Representation (politics)Materials scienceLayer (electronics)ArrowOpticsComposite materialEngineering drawingMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComputer scienceChromatographyPhysicsEngineeringDatabaseMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the first two sentences of Fig. 1 and Table 3 captions are identical. The correct captions are included as below: Fig. 1 | Application methodology and samples prepared. Graphical representation of the four-sided applicator with versatile bar and different distances (50, 100, 150, 200 μm) used to cast the mockups. Table 3. Summary of the result obtained with the scribe test. The tests were performed on samples of SET1 (Single-layer paint films) and SET2 (Side-by- side paint film) of: (1) cobalt blue; (2) earth colors; (3) whites colors; the arrows are positioned close to the slide; the tip of the arrow corresponds to the end of the mark observed on the surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it