MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400455998 · doi:10.1522/rhe.v8i3.1730

Quelques propos recueillis lors d’un entretien sur la reconnaissance des acquis à l’université

2024· article· fr· W4400455998 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Daniel Laurin

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue hybride de l éducation · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsBureau de Coopération Interuniversitaire
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Bureau de coopération interuniversitaire (BCI) a été mandaté en 2018 par le ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur (MES) afin de collaborer avec les universités pour l’avancement du dossier de la reconnaissance des acquis (RA) universitaire au Québec. Daniel Laurin, conseiller-expert en reconnaissance et en validation des acquis (RVA) au BCI, a été interviewé par Jean Pascal Lafrance en mars 2023 dans le cadre de la préparation de ce numéro spécial sur la reconnaissance et la validation des acquis expérientiels (RVAE) à l’université.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue hybride de l éducationSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207