PUPpy: a primer design pipeline for substrain-level microbial detection and absolute quantification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characterizing microbial communities at high resolution and with absolute quantification is crucial to unravel the complexity and diversity of microbial ecosystems. This can be achieved with PCR assays, which enable highly selective detection and absolute quantification of microbial DNA. However, a major challenge that has hindered PCR applications in microbiome research is the design of highly specific primer sets that exclusively amplify intended targets. Here, we introduce Phylogenetically Unique Primers in python (PUPpy), a fully automated pipeline to design microbe- and group-specific primers within a given microbial community. PUPpy can be executed from a user-friendly graphical user interface, or two simple terminal commands, and it only requires coding sequence files of the community members as input. PUPpy-designed primers enable the detection of individual microbes and quantification of absolute microbial abundance in defined communities below the strain level. We experimentally evaluated the performance of PUPpy-designed primers using two bacterial communities as benchmarks. Each community comprises 10 members, exhibiting a range of genetic similarities that spanned from different phyla to substrains. PUPpy-designed primers also enable the detection of groups of bacteria in an undefined community, such as the detection of a gut bacterial family in a complex stool microbiota sample. Taxon-specific primers designed with PUPpy showed 100% specificity to their intended targets, without unintended amplification, in each community tested. Lastly, we show the absolute quantification of microbial abundance using PUPpy-designed primers in droplet digital PCR, benchmarked against 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing. Our data shows that PUPpy-designed microbe-specific primers can be used to quantify substrain-level absolute counts, providing more resolved and accurate quantification in defined communities than short-read 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing. IMPORTANCE: Profiling microbial communities at high resolution and with absolute quantification is essential to uncover hidden ecological interactions within microbial ecosystems. Nevertheless, achieving resolved and quantitative investigations has been elusive due to methodological limitations in distinguishing and quantifying highly related microbes. Here, we describe Phylogenetically Unique Primers in python (PUPpy), an automated computational pipeline to design taxon-specific primers within defined microbial communities. Taxon-specific primers can be used to selectively detect and quantify individual microbes and larger taxa within a microbial community. PUPpy achieves substrain-level specificity without the need for computationally intensive databases and prioritizes user-friendliness by enabling both terminal and graphical user interface applications. Altogether, PUPpy enables fast, inexpensive, and highly accurate perspectives into microbial ecosystems, supporting the characterization of bacterial communities in both in vitro and complex microbiota settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".