KASUS PENYELESAIAN BATAS LAUT ANTARA INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subyek konflik Sipadan dan Ligitan dibawa ke Mahkamah Internasional pada tahun 1998, dan pada hari Selasa, 17 Desember 2002, ICJ menyampaikan putusan tentang masalah sengketa Sipadan-Ligatan antara Indonesia dan Malaysia. Akibatnya, Malaysia memperoleh 16 suara dalam pemungutan suara lembaga tersebut, sedangkan hanya satu hakim yang memilih Indonesia. 15 dari 17 hakim adalah hakim tetap MI, dengan satu orang Malaysia dan satu orang Indonesia di antaranya. Akibatnya, Malaysia harus diperhitungkan (Tanpa memutuskan masalah wilayah perairan dan batas laut), Kerajaan Inggris (Malaysia kolonial) telah mengambil upaya administratif yang nyata, seperti mengeluarkan peraturan untuk melestarikan burung yang terancam punah dan mengenakan pungutan penyu. Sejak tahun 1930, pengumpulan telur telah berlangsung, dan mercusuar telah beroperasi sejak tahun 1960-an. Sementara itu, operasional pariwisata Malaysia terabaikan, begitu pula penyangkalan yang didasarkan pada chain of title (suite milik Sultan Sulu), yang gagal membangun perbatasan maritim antara Malaysia dan Indonesia di Selat Makassar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it