Structure analysis of the telomere resolvase from the Lyme disease spirochete <i>Borrelia garinii</i> reveals functional divergence of its C-terminal domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Borrelia spirochetes are the causative agents of Lyme disease and relapsing fever, two of the most common tick-borne illnesses. A characteristic feature of these spirochetes is their highly segmented genomes which consists of a linear chromosome and a mixture of up to approximately 24 linear and circular extrachromosomal plasmids. The complexity of this genomic arrangement requires multiple strategies for efficient replication and partitioning during cell division, including the generation of hairpin ends found on linear replicons mediated by the essential enzyme ResT, a telomere resolvase. Using an integrative structural biology approach employing advanced modelling, circular dichroism, X-ray crystallography and small-angle X-ray scattering, we have generated high resolution structural data on ResT from B. garinii. Our data provides the first high-resolution structures of ResT from Borrelia spirochetes and revealed active site positioning in the catalytic domain. We also demonstrate that the C-terminal domain of ResT is required for both transesterification steps of telomere resolution, and is a requirement for DNA binding, distinguishing ResT from other telomere resolvases from phage and bacteria. These results advance our understanding of the molecular function of this essential enzyme involved in genome maintenance in Borrelia pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".