Disruptions to the Linear and Individual Narrative of Psychic Distress in Mike Barnes's The Lily Pond: A Memoir of Madness, Memory, Myth, and Metamorphosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter offers a close reading of The Lily Pond: A Memoir of Madness, Memory, Myth, and Metamorphosis (2008) , a life narrative in which American-Canadian author Mike Barnes weaves an account of his lifelong struggle with bipolar disorder that challenges the conventional illness narrative of triumph and the ableist temporal parameters in which it is inscribed. The chapter turns to the Bakhtinian concept of the chronotope to analyze how this challenge is inscribed through the temporal articulations that structure the four autobiographical essays that compound the memoir. In a first section, the chapter demonstrates how Barnes destabilizes the linear therapeutic trajectory that mental health strategies usually foster, while a second section examines the configuration of different intimate shared chronotopes that open the relational scheme of the narrative. Eventually, the chapter argues that Barnes’s disruption of linearity and individuality build a life narrative in which the unmanageability and uncertainty of living with chronic psychic distress are embraced and invested with hope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".