From circular to square‐based section spouted beds: Scale‐up and design overview of a multistage thermal unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work summarizes the results of several research projects to demonstrate the possibility of scaling‐up spouted beds by assembling a number of square‐based jet units. Cylindrical vessels with a bottom cone and parallelepiped ones with a frustum base do not differ to a large extent in terms of hydrodynamic features. The existing correlations can be used to predict these square‐based spouted beds. Spouted beds can be very reasonably described as well‐mixed reactors. By assembling several units, it is possible to approach a plug flow state for solids residence time distribution (RTD) in continuous processes. Spouting stability is fully reached when the modules do not interfere each other: this goal is obtained by positioning the downstream units at a certain lower level and having the solids move by overflow; placing internal vertical baffles between contiguous units is the solution. Two hydrodynamical models are proposed to describe single and multiple spouted beds; their predictions help in choosing the best geometrical configuration for the assemblage. A possible application of a multiple spouted bed reactor was envisaged for gasifying pelletized textile residues to generate syngas which can be directly used in situ as a co‐fuel. Two units were built: a single 0.2 m side square‐based spouted bed furnace and the consequent dual stage scale‐up apparatus suitable for an auto thermal process. In the bottom stage, four units work independently to run combustion/gasification of low‐quality solid residues, while the upper stage had a cascade of four modules to run pyrolysis/gasification of selected biomass and obtain valuable secondary products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".