Heli-SMACC: Helicase-targeting SMAll Molecule Compound Collection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Helicases have emerged as promising targets for the development of antiviral drugs; however, the family remains largely undrugged. To support the focused development of viral helicase inhibitors we identified, collected, and integrated all chemogenomics data for all available helicases from the ChEMBL database. After thoroughly curating and enriching the data with relevant annotations we have created a derivative database of helicase inhibitors which we dubbed Heli-SMACC ( Heli case-targeting SMA ll Molecule C ompound C ollection). The current version of Heli-SMACC contains 20,432 bioactivity entries for viral, human, and bacterial helicases. We have selected 30 compounds with promising viral helicase activity and tested them in a SARS-CoV-2 NSP13 ATPase assay. Twelve compounds demonstrated ATPase inhibition and a consistent dose-response curve. The Heli-SMACC database may serve as a reference for virologists and medicinal chemists working on the development of novel helicase inhibitors. Heli-SMACC is publicly available at https://smacc.mml.unc.edu . Highlights We created a curated Helicase-Targeting SMAll Molecule Compound Collection (Heli-SMACC). Heli-SMACC covers 29 human, viral, and bacterial helicases. Twelve of thirty selected compounds demonstrated inhibitory activity in a SARS-CoV-2 NSP13 ATPase Assay. Heli-SMACC is freely available online at https://smacc.mml.unc.edu . TOC Graphic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".