MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Talking About Our Own Emotions and the Emotions of Others at Work

2024· article· en· W4400479209 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Bradley, Lindred L. Greer, Stéphane Côté, Jeremy A. Yip, Kelly Lee, Gerben Alexander Van Kleef, Emily Hsu, William P. Bottom, Olivia Jurkiewicz, Yumeng Gu, Isaac Raymundo, Christopher Oveis, Yajun Cao, Amit Goldenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotional Intelligence and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)PsychologyEmotion workSocial psychologyCognitive psychologyAestheticsArtEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emotions have important implications for social interaction in the workplace. However, research has primarily focused on the effects of non-verbal displays of one’s own emotions and responses to the emotions of others. Important questions remain regarding the consequences of how individuals talk about their own emotions and the emotions of others at work. The five papers presented cover a broad range of interrelated topics (e.g., collective emotion regulation, verbal emotional expression) and represent different theoretical and empirical perspectives. Our discussant, Stéphane Côté, a leading scholar in the study of emotions, will close our session by offering a synthesis of papers and discussing with the audience future directions for the study of talking about emotions in the workplace. Through this symposium, we aim to generate new insights about how scholars can continue to study and improve the research on talking about the emotions of oneself and others at work. Emotional Expression and Exploitation Author: Jeremy Yip; Georgetown U., McDonough School of Business Author: Kelly Lee; - Leader Emotional Explication: Leaders Explaining the Reasons for Their Emotions Affects Followers Author: Christina Bradley; U. of Michigan, Ross School of Business Author: Gerben Alexander Van Kleef; U. of Amsterdam More than Fashion: Nostalgia’s Rose-Colored Glasses for Crisis and Interpersonal Emotion Management Author: Emily Hsu; Washington U. in St. Louis, Olin Business School Author: William Bottom; Washington U. in St. Louis Positive Empathy Emerges When People Neurobiologically Sync Up Author: Olivia Jurkiewicz; U. of California, San Diego Author: Yumeng Gu; U. of California, San Diego Author: Isaac Raymundo; Columbia Business School Author: Christopher Oveis; U. of California, San Diego Strategy but not Goal Determines Group Emotion Regulation Effectiveness Author: Yajun Cao; Harvard Business School Author: Amit Goldenberg; Harvard Business School

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.013
Scholarly communication0.0120.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207