MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400481833 · doi:10.24875/rmn.23000069

Nocturnal frontal opercular seizures masquerading as catathrenia: a case report and review of the literature

2024· article· en· W4400481833 on OpenAlexaff
Elma Paredes‐Aragón, Osvaldo Castellanos-Maya, Juan Carlos López‐Hernández, Julien Hébert, Eduard Bercovici, Charles F.P. George, Seyed M. Mirsattari

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Fomento Social · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNocturnalPsychologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 33-year-old man with two bilateral tonic-clonic seizures of unknown onset 12 years earlier was admitted to our epilepsy monitoring unit for characterization of his nocturnal groaning spells suspicious for catathrenia.Video-scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) was suggestive of drug-resistant non-lesional localization-related focal epilepsy in the right hemisphere.Intracranial EEG showed right frontal opercular origin of seizures with insular spread as the cause of his spells.This illustrative case shows the importance of video-EEG monitoring to distinguish nocturnal frontal opercular seizures from catathrenia.We review the evidence on distinguishing the two disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Fomento SocialSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207