MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400483038 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2023-0152

Effect of tooth surface wear on dynamic characteristics of spur gear transmission system

2024· article· en· W4400483038 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. W. Zhao, Hongchuan Cheng, Kaiwen Lu, Songnian Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSpurSpur gearTooth surfaceSurface (topology)Transmission (telecommunications)Tooth wearStructural engineeringMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringAutomotive engineeringGeologyEngineeringGeometryMathematicsOrthodonticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The meshing stiffness and system dynamic characteristics caused by gear wear fault are studied. Firstly, potential energy method was used to model and solve the meshing stiffness of gears and the effect of wear on the meshing stiffness and static transfer error was analyzed. A 6-dof spur gear dynamics model was established considering various nonlinear factors, and the dynamic responses of the spur gear system under various wear degrees were analyzed by using time domain, spectrum, phase plane, and Poincare mapping. Finally, the visual test platform of the gear box is built, and the wear condition and dynamic response of the gear box under different wear cycles are analyzed. Results show that the meshing stiffness of gear decreases due to wear, and the meshing stiffness of double tooth decreases more than that of single tooth. In addition, the static transmission errors caused by wear changes periodically with meshing frequency. Wear causes the vibration response of gear system to become complex gradually, and the nonlinear of the system is enhanced, which changes from single period motion to quasi period motion. Results can provide theoretical support for gear wear reduction, life extension, vibration reduction, and noise reduction and lubrication improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207