Molecular Descriptors Of Certain Class Of Carbon Nanocone Networks Through Quotient Graph Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanoparticles have potential applications in a wide range of fields, including electronics, medicine and material research, because of their remarkable and exceptional attributes. Carbon nanocones are planar carbon networks with mostly hexagonal faces and a few non-hexagonal faces (mostly pentagons) in the core. Two types of nanocone configurations are possible: symmetric and asymmetric, depending on where the pentagons are positioned within the structure. In addition to being a good substitute for carbon nanotubes, carbon nanocones have made an identity for themselves in a number of fields, including biosensing, electrochemical sensing, biofuel cells, supercapacitors, gas storage devices, and biomedical applications. Their astonishing chemical and physical attributes have made them well-known and widely accepted in the fields of condensed matter physics, chemistry, material science, and nanotechnology. Mathematical and chemical breakthroughs were made possible by the concept of modeling a chemical structure as a chemical graph and quantitatively analyzing the related graph using molecular descriptors. Molecular descriptors are useful in many areas of chemistry, biology, computer science, and other sciences because they allow for the analysis of chemical structures without the need for experiments. In this work, the quotient graph approach is used to establish the distance based descriptors of symmetrically configured two-pentagonal and three-pentagonal carbon nanocones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".