Construction of Financial Bill Recognition Model Based on Deep Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The common bills in life include VAT invoices, taxi invoices, train invoices, plane itineraries, machine-printed invoices, etc. Most of these common bills are presented in the form of fixed form templates, so template matching can be used. , for a certain fixed template bill, manually set the rules to determine the spatial position of the key area, extract the corresponding text information, or build a model with logical semantic relationship and spatial relative relationship between the bill texts of different attributes, from the global image of the image. Identify the required key text information in the text information. However, these methods are either limited by fixed ticket templates, or cannot guarantee considerable accuracy. The electronicization of paper invoices mainly needs to go through the steps of text detection, bill recognition and text recognition. Based on this, this paper adopts the DL method. Construct a financial bill recognition model and combine experiments to explore the effectiveness and superiority of the model. The results show that our model can achieve a recognition accuracy rate of up to 91\%, and also achieve a 26\% improvement in recognition speed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it