Stability Analysis of Tunnel Rock Mechanical Parameters Based on Multi-Source Sensor Data Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the sensor is applied to the collection of rock parameter data. Aiming at the classification and evaluation of stability (i.e. rock quality), an attribute recognition model for the classification and evaluation of surrounding rock quality of underground engineering is established. Using multi-source data fusion and orthogonal numerical simulation test methods, the effects of rock mechanics parameters on the horizontal convergence of the tunnel, the settlement of the vault and the plastic zone coefficient are studied. Six factors (elastic modulus, Poisson’s ratio, internal friction angle, tensile strength, cohesion and density) and three levels of orthogonal experimental solutions were selected. The method of defining similar weight by using similar number to determine the weight of evaluation index, so as to calculate the comprehensive attribute measure, and apply confidence criteria to identify the stability of rock samples. Through the analysis and evaluation of rock mass quality classification of underground engineering, the application of the model and the evaluation method of rock mass quality classification are explained. The test results match the orthogonal test results; Considering the stability of tunnel envelope, the horizontal convergence, vault settlement and plastic zone coefficient after excavation should be comprehensively considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".