MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400490882 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.09.24310101

Stem Cell-Derived Gene Expression Scores Predict Survival and Blastic Transformation in Myelofibrosis

2024· preprint· en· W4400490882 on OpenAlexaff
Jessie J.F. Medeiros, Andy G.X. Zeng, Michelle Chan‐Seng‐Yue, Tristan Woo, Suraj Bansal, Hyerin Kim, Jessica McLeod, Andrea Arruda, Hubert Tsui, Jaime O. Claudio, Dawn Maze, Hassan Sibai, Mark D. Minden, James A. Kennedy, Jean Wang, John E. Dick, Vikas Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyelofibrosisTransformation (genetics)GeneGene expressionCancer researchBiologyStem cellOncologyInternal medicineMedicineComputational biologyGeneticsBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Purpose Myelofibrosis (MF) is the most severe myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) where there remains a need for improved risk stratification methods to better inform patient management. Since MF is a stem cell driven disease and stem cell informed transcriptomic information has been shown to be prognostic across other clinical settings we sought to use this information to generate novel transcriptomic-based risk stratification models that could complement current approaches. Patients and Methods We identified 358 MF patients from the MPN registry at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02760238 ) from whom peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected and clinical data was available. We randomly split our cohort into a 250-patient training set and a 108-patient test set to train and validate prognostic models, respectively. Results Within the training set we used repeated nested cross validation together with LASSO regression from various starting gene sets and found that the best prognostic models were consistently derived from transcriptomic variation among MF stem cells. From this gene set we trained our final model, a 24-gene weighted expression score (termed, MPN24) that is prognostic for overall survival. Patients were classified as MPN24-High or MPN24-Low risk depending on whether their scores were above or below the within cohort median defined in the training set. The prognostic power of MPN24 was validated in the test set patients with stark differences in survival outcomes for MPN24-High (5-year survival rate = 21% [95% CI 9%-52%]) and MPN24-Low risk patients (5-year survival rate = 71% [95% CI 57-88%]) patients, resulting in a HR of 5.3 (95% CI: 2.6-10.5; p=2.08e-6). MPN24 captures unique prognostic information to current risk stratification models such as DIPSS, MIPSS70 and the Genomic-Personalized Risk scores. Therefore, we present a novel 3-tier risk stratification approach that integrates DIPSS and MPN24 to more effectively risk stratify MF patients, particularly via up or downscaling patient risk within the DIPSS-Intermediate-1/2 categories. In this integrated model patients were classified as Integrated-Low, Integrated-Intermediate or Integrated-High, and experienced 5-year survival rates of 88.2% [95% CI 77.9% - 99.9%], 39.3% [95% CI 19.9% - 77.7%], and 10.8% [95% CI 2.1% - 55.8%], respectively (likelihood ratio test p = 1e-8). Finally, from MPN24 genes we derived a 13-gene subsignature (termed, MPN13) from the training set patients that was validated to predict time-to-transformation in the test set patients when classified as MPN13-High or Low relative to the 80th percentile of MPN13 scores from the training set (p=0.0047). In the test set, MPN13-High and MPN13-Low patients experienced 3-year cumulative incidences of transformation of 5.2% [95% CI 0.2%-10.2%] and 28.6% [95% CI 3.1%-54.0%] respectively, after adjusting for death as a competing risk. Conclusions Transcriptomic information informed by MF stem cells offer novel and unique prognostic potential in MF that significantly complements current approaches. Future work will be needed to validate the robustness of the approach in external cohorts and identify how patient management can be optimized with these novel transcriptomic biomarkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207