MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400492272 · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100758

Evaluation of additional resources used in therapist-assisted transdiagnostic internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy

2024· article· en· W4400492272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Interventions · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistry of Health, SaskatchewanAustralian GovernmentUniversity of Regina
KeywordsPsychotherapistCognitionThe InternetPsychologyCognitive behaviour therapyClinical psychologyComputer sciencePsychiatryWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) programs, beyond standardized core ICBT lessons, brief additional resources are sometimes available to clients to address comorbid concerns or offer additional information/strategies. These resources remain understudied in terms of how they are selected and perceived by clients, as well as their relationship to satisfaction and outcomes. Among clients ( N = 793) enrolled in a 5-lesson transdiagnostic ICBT course, we examined client use and perceptions of 18 additional resources at 8 weeks in terms of whether clients found resources informative (yes/no) and or helpful (yes/no). Resources elaborated on cognitive strategies (managing beliefs, risk calculation) or on managing specific problems (agricultural stress, alcohol misuse, anger, assertiveness, chronic conditions, communication, grief, health anxiety, motivation, pain, panic, postpartum depression/anxiety, PTSD, sleep, workplace accomodations, worry). Clients also completed symptom measures and ICBT satisfaction questions at 8 weeks. Approximately 50 % ( n = 398) of clients rated the resources and, on average, clients reported that 3.35 (SD = 3.34) resources were informative and 2.35 (SD = 2.52) resources were helpful as measured by direct questions developed for this study. Higher pre-treatment PTSD and GAD scores were related to a greater number of resources perceived as informative and or helpful. Rating more resources as informative and or helpful had a weak but positive association with ICBT satisfaction and depression, anxiety, PTSD and insomnia change scores. Limitations of the study include that 31 % ( n = 245) did not respond to questions about use of resources and 18.9 % ( n = 150) said they did not review resources. There is considerable use of diverse additional resources in ICBT in routine care. Associations suggest that clients are using resources to personalize treatment to their needs and these resources are associated with treatment satisfaction and outcomes. The correlational associations between symptoms and perceived helpfulness of resources can help inform personalization algorithms to optimize ICBT delivery for clients. Further research on how to match clients with, encourage use of, and maximize benefits of resources would be beneficial. • Brief additiogepnal resources can help to personalize ICBT. • Resources on worry, beliefs, and sleep were downloaded most often. • Positive resource ratings were associated with ICBT satisfaction. • Positive resource ratings were associated with symptom change scores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it